本书介绍了民间融资刑法规制及司法现状。其中，第一章介绍我国民间融资的发展历程，以及政府对民间融资的态度变迁。第二章分析非法吸收公共存款和集资诈骗这两个高度胶着的犯罪构成和立法及司法界定，分析其混同状态的成因及存在原因--共同维护金融业的高强度限控。第三章分析非法吸收公共存款罪和集资诈骗罪的区别--“非法占有”目的--的证成方式，展现现有证成方式对这两个罪名之间界限一步模糊的司法实践状态。第四章通过数据分析展现我国历年非法集资案件括非法吸收公众存款案件和集资诈骗案件的走势，从中可以看出民间融资的风险以及犯罪演化的风险和规模，并分析司法裁判的态度和走势。第五章详细分析出现上述定罪走势的原因和影响要素，比如投资人法律地位的认定、共犯的界定范围、投资人地位对集资数额认定的影响以及集资款返还的困难对定罪态度的影响。

韩阳，女，北京第二外国语学院国际法学院教授，法学博士，主要研究方向：刑事诉讼法学、刑法学、证据及司法制度。中国刑事诉讼法学研究会理事、北京市法学会旅游法研究会理事。1999年毕业于中国政法大学国际经济法系，获法学学士学位。1999年至2005在中国政法大学刑事司法学院攻读硕士研究生和博士研究生，分别获得中国政法大学刑事诉讼法专业硕士学位和博士学位。2007年至2010年于中国社会科学院法学所从事博士后研究，2010年出站。北京市教委青年拔尖人才计划资助人选，法国波尔多第四大学访问学者，美国俄勒冈大学法学院访问学者、客座教授。

PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1 CHANGES IN CHINA'S PRIVATE FINANCING MODELS AND THE CONCERNING REGULATIONS
А.THE ANCENT "HEHUI" MODEL IN CHINA
B.OVERALL PATHS AND REGULATIONSFOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRIVATE FINANCING IN CHINA
CHAPTER 2 ESTABLISHMENTS FOR ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING AND FUND-RAISING FRAUD
A.PONZI SCHEME AND ILLEGAL FUND-RAISING
B.LEGISLATIONS FOR ILLEGAL PUBLICDEPOSIT ABSORBING AND FUND-RAISING FRAUD IN CHINA
1.A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
2.STIPULATIONS FOR ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING
3.REGULATIONS FOR FUND- RAISING FRAUD
C.A BRIEF SUMMARY: HIGHLYCONVERGENT REQUIREMENTS FOR CRIMINAL ELEMENTS OF THE TWO CHARGES PROOF RULES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF
CHAPTER 3 THE PURPOSE OF "ILLEGAL POSSESSION" PUARTHER BLUR THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN TWO CRIMES
A.LEGISLATIVE AND JUDICIAL ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE PROOF FOR THE PURPOSE OF "ILLEGAL POSSESSION" IN FUND-RAISING CASES
B.THE SIGNIFICANCE OF YING WU'S CASE
C.JUDICIAL PRACTICE AFTER YING WU
1.YIMIN DU FUND-RAISING FRAUD CASE
2.OTHER TYPICAL CASES PUBLISHED BY THE SPC
3.ANALYSIS FOR THE GUIDING CASE RELEASED BY THE SPP
D.COMMENTS ON THE PROOF MODE FOR “ILLEGAL POSSESSION” PURPOSE
CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS: THE ADJUDICATION ATTITUDE AND TREND FOR ILLEGAL FUND-RAISING CASES
A.ANALYSIS FOR DATA COMING FROMCJO AND OTHER DATABASES
1.DATA OF ADJUDICATIONS ASTO ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING
2.DATA OF ADJUDICATIONS AS TOFUND-RAISING FRAUD
3.DATA ANALYSIS
a.OVERALL TREND FOR THE ADJUDICATIONS
b.ANALYSIS FOR THE AREA DISTRIBUTIONS OF CASES
c.OTHER ISSUES SEEN FROM THE DATA
B.DATA RELEASED IN THE OVERNMENT WORK REPORTS BY SPC AND SPP OVER THE YEARS
C.DATA FROM OTHER SOURCES
CHAPTER 5 THE INFLUENCE OF INVESTOR'S LEGAL STATUS DETERMINATION AND REMEDY ON JUDICIAL CONVICTION ATTITUDE IN ILLEGAL FUND RAISING CASES
A.LITIGATION STATUS OF COMMON INVESTORS
B.THE SCOPE OF THE ACCOMPLICE
C.THE DIFFERENT AMOUNT CALCULATION FOR FUNDS RAISED BASED ON DIFFERENT INVESTORS' LEGAL STATUS
1.CALCULATION OF THE AMOUNT OF FUND RAISED IN CASES OF FUND-RAISING FRAUD
2.CALCULATION OF THE AMOUNTOF FUNDS RAISED IN CASES OF ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING
3.THE AMOUNT NOT TO BE CALCULATED
D.THE FURTHER STRENGTHENED PROSECUTION AND JUDICIAL SLANTED ATTITUDE TOWARDS ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING BY THE DIFFICULT ECOVERY AND COMPENSATION PROCEDURES
1.THE IMPACT OF "CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRIOR TO CIVIL PROCEDURE" PRINCIPLE ON INVESTORS' CLAIMS
2.THE PRACTICAL EFFECT OF RECOVERY AND COMPENSATION
CONCLUSION