黄英姗著的《恐怖主义形象的语言学研究--以纽约时报为例》的分析表明，认知语言学范式将为批评话语分析提供新的分析概念和手段，促进批评话语分析的深入发展。本书是将认知语言学与批评话语分析结合起来的一个尝试，研究范围聚焦于概念隐喻。实际上，认知语言学的许多思想有潜在的重大价值，包括范畴化、概念隐喻、概念转喻、识解和概念整合等。如果能够把这些新的概念分析工具应用于对恐怖主义话语的研究，不仅能够深化对恐怖主义的研究，而且能够扩展认知语言学的应用范围。

Preface

Chapter One Introduction

 1.1 Background to This Research

 1.2 Purpose of This Research

 1.3 General Approach and Research Questions

 1.4 Organization of the Book

Chapter Two Literature Review

 2.1 Evolving Process of Terrorism

 2.2 Definitions of Terrorism

2.2, 1 Academic Definitions

2.2.2 US Definitions of Terrorism

2.2.3 EU Definitions

2.2.4 UN Definition

2.2.5 Definition of Terrorism in This Book

 2.3 Previous Approaches to Terrorism

2, 3.1 Non-linguistic Approaches

2.3.2 Linguistic Approaches

 2.4 Limitations of Previous Research

Chapter Three Critical Discourse Analysis 

  3.1 Philosophical Basis of CDA

3.1. l Gramsci

3.1.2 Althusser

3.1.3 Foucauh

3.1.4 Bourdieu

  3.2 Linguistic Basis of CDA

3.2.1 Sociolinguisties

3.2.2 Pragmaties

3.2.3 Non-neutrality in Grammar

  3.3 Systemic Functional Grammar and CDA

3.3. l System

3.3.2 Functions

  3.4 From Critical Linguistics to CDA

3.4.1 Critical Linguistics

3.4.2 Shift to CDA

  3.5 Central Concepts of CDA

3.5. l Discourse

3.5.2 Critical

3.5, 3 Power

3.5.4 Ideology

3, 5.5 Principles of CDA

3.5.6 Goals in Theory and Practice

 3.6 Representative Approaches in CDA

3.6.1 Norman Fairelough

3.6.2 Van Dijk

3.6.3 Ruth Wodak

 3.7 Summary

Chapter Four Cognitive Linguistics

 4.1 Central Hypotheses

 4.2 Experientialism

4.2.1 Embodiment of Meaning

4.2.2 The Central Role of Meaning

4.2.3 Encyclopedic Nature of Meaning

4.2.4 Mental Imagery and Construal

 4.3 Categorization

4.3.1 Classic Categories and Prototypes

4.3.2 Categorization and Reasoning

4.3.3 Influence of Linguistic Categorization on Thinking

4.3.4 Dynamicity of Categorization and Ideology

4.3.5 Categorization and Stereotypes

4.3.6 Binary Oppositions in Categorization

 4.4 Metaphor

4.4.1 Conceptual Metaphor

4.4, 2 Metaphor and Culture

4.4.3 Metaphor and Ideology

4.4.4 Social Consequences of Metaphor

 4.5 Conceptual Metonymy

4.5.1 Conceptual Nature of Metonymy

4.5.2 Experiential Basis of Metonymy

 4.6 Conceptual Integration

 4.7 Summary

Chapter Five Research Design and Methodology

 5.1 Research Design

5.1.1 Corpus-based Approach

5.1.2 Source of Data

5.1.3 Method of Data Collection

  5.2 Critical Metaphor Analysis

5.2.1 Identification

5.2.2 Interpretation

5.2.3 Explanation

5.2.4 Steps of Analysis

Chapter Six Data Analysis: Conceptual Metaphors of Terrorimn

  6.1 War Metaphor

  6.2 Religion Metaphor

6.2.1 TERRORISM IS ISLAM

6.2.2 TERRORIM IS EVIL

  6.3 Lawlessness Metaphor

  6.4 Barbarism Metaphor

6.4.1 TERRORISM IS TYRANNY

6.4.2 TERRORISM IS SAVAGE

  6.5 Dehumanization Metaphor

6.5.1 TERRORISM IS HUNTED ANIMAL

6.5.2 TERRORISM 1S INSECT

6.5.3 TERRORISM IS DISEASE

Chapter Seven Power of Metaphors to Demonize Terrorism

 7.1 Power of Conceptual Metaphor in Pohtical Discourse

7.1.1 Legifimization and Reification

7.1.2 Suppressing Alternative Views

 7.2 Faces of Terrorism

7.2.1 Evil Stranger

7.2.2 Faceless Animals

7.2.3 Enemy of God

7.2.4 Barbarian

  7.3 Stereotypes of Terrorism

7.3.1 Stereotype is Categorization

7.3.2 Stereotypes of Enemy

7.3.3 Consolidation of Stereotypes

Chapter Eight Consequences of Metaphor

  8.1 Mass Media and the Govermment

8.1.1 The Propaganda Model

8.1.2 Relationship between Mass Media and the Government

  8.2 Discourse of Fear

8.2.1 Impact of Discourse of Fear

8.2.2 Fear after 9.11

  8.3 Power of Language : From Discourse to Genocide

8.3.1 Confusion between Muslim and Terrorism

8.3.2 Violations of Human Rights

8.3.3 Path to Genocide

Chapter Nine Conclusion

  9.1 Major Findings

  9.2 Limitations

9.3 Suggestions for Further Research

Bibliography