This Norton Critical Edition of the At)ologia stresses the literary,, humanistic, and religious power of the text, Newman's personal development, and the progress of the Oxford movement, teprinted is a definitive text,which reached its final form about 1886 and incorporates all of Newman's later changes. Extensive notes are provided.

"Basic Texts of the Newman-Kingsley Controversy" enables students to see the AFologia by setting it against other important documents in the Newman-Kingsley controversy. Included in the book are correspondence, Kingsley's pamphlet "What, Then, Does I)r. Newman Mean?," Newman's pamphlets "Mr. Kings- ley's Mode of Disputation" and "True Mode of Meeting Mr.Kingsley," and Newman's two Appendices of 1866.

Foreword

A Note on The Text

A Newman Chronology

The Text of Apologia Pro Vita Sua

Basic Texts of the Newman-Kingsley Controversy

 Mr. Kingsley and Dr. Newman: A Correspondence on the Question Whether Dr. Newman Teaches That Truth is No Virtue?

Charles Kingsley: What, Then, Does Dr. Newman Mean?

John Henry Newman: Mr. Kingsley's Method of Disputation True Mode of Meeting Mr. Kingsley

Newman's Two Appendices of 1866

Origin and Reception of the Apologia

Martin J. Svaglie·Why Newman Wrote the Apologia

John Henry Newman·Letter to Canon Flanagan, 1857

Walter E. Houghton·The Issue Between Kingsley and Newman

Vincent Ferrer Blehl·Early Criticism of the Apologia

Essays in Criticism

Lewis E. Gates·Newman as a Prose-\\Vriter

Walter E. Houghton·Style and the Dramatic Re-creation of the Past

Martin J. Svaglic·The Structure of Newman's Apologia

Robert A. Colby·The Poetical Structure of Newman's Apologia pro Vita Sua

Robert A. Colby·The Structure of Newman's Apologia

pro Vita Sua in Relation to His Theory of Assent

Leonard W· Deen·The Rhetoric of Newman's Apologia

David J. DeLaura·Newman's Apologia as Prophecy

Bibliography