袁传有所著的《避免二次伤害——警察讯问言语研究》属于法律语言学研究领域，旨在运用语言学理论和方法分析、解决法律问题。本研究中的“二次伤害”指警察的讯问言语对家庭暴力案件中作为犯罪嫌疑人的受虐女性所造成的言语伤害。基于言语适应理论和语言评价理论，本研究建构了“多维度言语转变模型”作为研究警察话语的分析框架，从社会、文化和心理维度就警察言语进行话语分析，并得出结论：“二次伤害”问题可以通过警察讯问模式的变革—从讯问到询问的言语转变加以避免。

Acknowledgements

List of Figures and Tables

Chapter 1 Introduction

 1.1 Rationale of This Study

 1.2 Working Definitions

 1.3 Research Objective

 1.4 Research Questions

 1.5 Data and Research Methodology

1.5.1 Data Collection and Data Classification

1.5.2 Research Methods

 1.6 Significance of This Study

 1.7 Organization of This Book

Chapter 2 Previous Studies of Relevant Topics

 2.1 Introduction

 2.2 Studies on Domestic Violence

2.2.1 Definitions of Domestic Violence and Violence Against Women

2.2.2 Relevant Laws and Regulations

2.2.3 Research on DV/VAW

 2.3 Research on Police Interrogations

2.3.1 Interrogation Tactics and Techniques

2.3.2 Approach of Forensic Psychology

2.3.3 Communication Approach to Policing Domestic Violence

2.3.4 Approach of Forensic Linguistics

2.3.5 Legislative Power of Interrogating Suspects by the Police in China

2.3.6 Approaches to Language Issues of Police Interrogations in China

2.3.7 Related Research on Linguistic Strategies in Courtroom Interaction

 2.4 Linguistic Theories Relevant to Speech Shifting

2.4.1 A Survey of the Speech Accommodation Theory

2.4.2 SAT in Use

2.4.3 An Overview of the SFL and Its Appraisal Theory

2.4.4 SFL and Appraisal Theory in Use

2.4.5 The Birmingham School of Discourse Analysis

 2.6 Summary

Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework

 3.1 Introduction

 3.2 Revisiting the Linguistic Theories Along Three Dimensions

3.2.1 Engagement System Realizing Social Variables: Power and Solidarity

3.2.2 Accommodation Adapting to Cultural and Psychological Dimensions

3.2.3 Language Devices Realizing the Linguistic Strategies

 3.2.3.1 Lexical Choice and Information Density

 3.2.3.2 Grammatical Variation and Pragmatic Transmutation

 3.2.3.3 Exchange Structure: Two-Move Versus Three-Move Exchanges

 3.2.3.4 Structural Location

 3.3 The Analytical Framework

3.3.1 The Notion of Speech Shifting

3.3.2 A Multi-Dimensional Speech Shifting Model

 3.4 Summary

Chapter 4 Speech Shifting Along the Social Dimension

 4.1 Introduction

 4.2 Conventional Speech in Police Interrogations

4.2.1 Power Relation Dominating Police Interrogations

4.2.2 Dialogic Contraction as a Linguistic Strategy to Maintain Power Relation

4.2.3 Micro Strategies and Language Devices to Realize Dialogic Contraction

 4.2.3.1 Identifying Intergroup Membership

 4.2.3.2 Controlling Exchange/Discourse Structure

 4.2.3.3 Delivering Police Warnings

 4.2.3.4 Proclaiming the Criminal Policy

 4.2.3.5 Making Use of Pragmatic Transmutation

4.2.4 Limitations of the Conventional Interrogation Speech

 4.3 Speech Shifting to Police Interviewing

4.3.1 Solidarity Relation Prevailing in Police Interviewing

4.3.2 Dialogic Expansion as a Linguistic Strategy to Build Solidarity Relation

4.3.3 Micro Strategies and Language Devices to Realize Dialogic Expansion

 4.3.3.1 Establishing Rapport with Suspects

 4.3.3.2 Attenuating Suspect's Criminal Liability

 4.3.3.3 Accentuating Victim's Blunder

 4.3.3.4 Being Sympathetic and Empathetic to Suspects

 4.3.3.5 Delivering Police Cautions

4.3.4 Merits of the Police Interviewing Speech

 4.4 Summary

Chapter 5 Speech Shifting Along the Cultural Dimension

 5.1 Introduction

 5.2 Cultural Dimension Affecting Speech Shifting

5.2.1 Police Culture

5.2.2 The Suspects' Literacy

5.2.3 Culture-Determined Speech Shitling

 5.3 Speech Divergence in Police Interrogations

5.3.1 Lexical Divergence

5.3.2 Grammatical Divergence

 5.3.2.1 Divergent Statements

 5.3.2.2 Divergent Mands

 5.3.2.3 Divergent Questions

5.3.3 Discursive Divergence

 5.4 Speech Convergence in Police Interviewing

5.4.1 Lexical Convergence

5.4.2 Grammatical Convergence

 5.4.2.1 Convergent Statements to Deliver Police Cautions

 5.4.2.2 Convergent Mands to Make Requests

 5.4.2.3 Convergent Questions to Seek Information

5.4.3 Discursive Convergence

5.4.4 Speech Shifting from Divergence to Convergence

 5.5 Summary

Chapter 6 Speech Shifting Along the Psychological Dimension

 6.1 Introduction

 6.2 Attitude-Related Speech Shifting

6.2.1 Perception-Related Linguistic Strategies

6.2.2 Affect-Related Speech Accommodation

 6.2.2.1 Speech Divergence with Negative Affect

 6.2.2.2 Speech Convergence with Positive Affect

 6.3 Role-Based Speech Shifting

6.3.1 Speech Accommodation Based on Differing Police Roles

6.3.2 Speech Accommodation Based on Perceived Roles of Suspects

 6.4 Motivation-Driven Speech Shifting

6.4.1 Speech Divergence Motivated by Eliciting Evidence and Confessions

6.4.2 Speech Convergence Motivated by Seeking Information for Justice

 6.5 Gender-Differentiated Speech Shifting

6.5.1 Speech Accommodation on Gender Difference of the Police

6.5.2 Speech Accommodation on Gender Difference of Suspects

 6.6 Summary

Chapter 7 Conclusion

 7.1 Summary of the Present Study

 7.2 Major Findings of the Study

7.2.1 Findings Along the Social Dimension

7.2.2 Findings Along the Cultural Dimension

7.2.3 Findings Along the Psychological Dimension

 7.3 Conclusions

 7.4 Implications

 7.5 Limitations

 7.6 Suggestions for Future Research

References

Appendices

 Appendix I: Legislative Stipulations on "Interrogation"

Versus "Interviewing"

 Appendix Ih Police Cautions